COULD YOU SURVIVE IN A SCOTLAND WITHOUT THE SNP PAYING YOUR WAY?

If you read this, research it’s truth and STILL don’t like the SNP, I can only say “You are selfish and/or scared” EVERYTHING above is what the SNP Government provides for EVERY Scottish person. So next time you get paid, please look at the list above and TRY and understand how a Devolved Scotland is helping your bank account. So when you vote Tory or Blue Labour, understand the SNP are financially helping you, holding you up and supporting you. The lies will be believed, people will say things like “THE SNP SIDES WITH NAZI GERMANY IN THE 1930” as a pathetic time travelling ruse to make you dislike the SNP. Also Labour canvassers are TODAY telling people in Motherwell, pensioners in Motherwell that “If you vote SNP you WILL lose your Free bus pass” This is a Lie! This is one of many lies that the old might fall for again.

Forget the Unionist and Loyalist hater, they are gone and will vote against the SNP out of racist and sectarian thoughts filled with hate and blind love of all things Royal and Tory. I say again ‘NOT TILL FISCAL TROUBLES HIT YOUR POCKET WILL YOU CARE” and “NOT TILL ILLNESS OR DISABILTY HIT YOU OR LOVED ONES WILL YOU UNDERSTAND BEING IN SCOTLAND WITH THE SNP WILL HELP YOU”.

Who in Scotland can deny the truth of the list above? Do some research and do the right thing for SCOTLAND! Not your bank account or your faith in anything outside your own life. I know some who hate the SNP and tell lies, I know people who tell me “Shaun, Foodbanks don’t exist, it’s a lie” Some believe it to be true, some just don’t see suffering. Trust me; if the SNP scrapped all the fiscal help to ALL PEOPLE LIVING IN Scotland, people would change their tune. I am wasting my time here, but the list above, seriously read it and ask “Where do they help me” and also “If all this help from the SNP stopped, would it affect me” Also leave you with a document I was sent today by a friend. Take it as you see it, or ignore it blindly, selfishly or with hate. I want Scotland free for all our kids, for Scotland in 100 years from now when we are all dead. What about you? Even forget the SNP if you must and just think ‘What would a free Scotland be’ – And people are STILL falling for the Tory/Labour and Media lies 😦 Tragic it is

IMAGINE THE POWER OF A FREE SCOTLAND WHEN WE SEE CLEARLY HOW EVERY SCOTTISH PERSON IS HELPED!!

Learn from the past Scotland:

April 17th 2015: ‘UN Human Rights Chief’ Compares UK Media to Nazi Propaganda

September 16th 2014: Scotland – Why did you vote Yes or No? Did you have reason? Have you changed?

September 10th 2014: Scotland – We can’t be scared nor selfish, don’t be the Worlds joke!

September 19th 2014: Scotland Vote No In Referendum – Selfish, Scared People, Well Done!

July 13th 2014: Why We Can’t Be Selfish In This Vote Scotland

July 22nd 2015: Fascist State Westminster Establishment? – The List!!

February 19th 2016: The awful Social Media Impact on the Scottish Yes Movement

November 29th 2014: Ex BBC Business Editor Slams The BBC For Anti-Scottish Independence ‘Propaganda’

MORE LOVE, LESS HATE

blogger-for-peace-van-2

BLOGGERS FOR PEACE AND SANITY

THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT ALL DISABLED PEOPLE

THIS DOES NOT REPRESENT ALL DISABLED PEOPLE

Shaun Gibson Twitter: @ShaunyScot
Skype Username: shaunyg1973
Shaun Celtic FC Twitter: @ShaunyCeltic

THE ABOVE IMAGE NEEDS CHANGED TO THIS - THIS REPRESENTS 'BETTER' FOR SOCIETY TO JUDGE

THE ABOVE IMAGE NEEDS CHANGED TO THIS – THIS REPRESENTS ‘BETTER’ FOR SOCIETY TO JUDGE

 

Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘I supplied underage rent boys for Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet ministers’ As Media go for Tories and Westminster HARD

Anthony-Gilberthorpe-pictured-in-London

Anthony Gilberthorpe pictured in London

I have been blogging, doing articles and telling anyone who would listen THIS was happening and would break. This morning, the Printed media are taking the Torie Party and Westminster as a whole to the cleaners. How high does this go? Well one thing I do know, is this is the tip if a HUGE iceberg involving the above, the Vatican and the Royal Family. But who will have the bravery to spill the Royal Family involvement? Not me. Not now

3 HUGE Media hits against the ‘Establishment’ and ‘No for Scotland’ Today. Is there an Agenda? I just did this on two, now a third one. https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/13/questions-over-better-togethers-lies-over-registration-for-referendum-role-as-sundays-media-attack-westminster/ Why would 3 HARD HITS come in one day? This could bring down The Conservative Party and much of Government. I am thinking is this some ploy to keep Scotland thinking ‘All will be well’ If so, PLEASE DON’T BE FOOLED, they did this before. But lets stick to these 3 stories today

STORY 1

Thatcher covered up Conservative Sex Scandal – WOW MEDIA ARE GOING WITH IT!

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/13/thatcher-covered-up-conservative-sex-scandal-wow-media-are-going-with-it/

STORY 2

BETTER Together’s place in the referendum campaign was last night thrown into confusion, after it emerged its official application to take part contained the wrong address.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/questions-over-better-togethers-registration-for-referendum-role.24741622

Now this!! STORY 3! 

Senior Tory cabinet ministers were supplied with underage boys for sex parties, it is sensationally claimed. Former Conservative activist Anthony Gilberthorpe said he told Margaret Thatcher 25 years ago about what he had witnessed and gave her names of those involved. His allegations that he saw top Tories having sex with boys comes after David Cameron launched a Government inquiry into claims of a cover-up. Anthony, 52, said: “I am prepared to speak to the inquiry. I believe I am a key witness.” Trawling seedy streets during a Tory conference, Gilberthorpe says he was asked to find underage rent boys for a private sex party at a top hotel.

Today, more than three decades later, he claims he was acting on the orders of some of the most senior figures of Margaret Thatcher’s government. Anthony says he was a ­full-time ­political activist when he helped procure the “youngest and prettiest” boys for several cabinet ministers after being told to find “entertainment”. In a series of explosive claims about conferences at Blackpool and Brighton in the 1980s, he alleges boys as young as 15 indulged in alcohol and cocaine before they had sex with the powerful politicians. He says one person who attended a party is a current serving minister. Others said to be present at the parties included Keith Joseph, Rhodes Boyson, Dr Alistair Smith and Michael Havers

As a young aspiring politician, Mr Gilberthorpe admits being in awe of the men, but now insists: “They ­manipulated and groomed me to do their bidding.” He said: “I was just 17 when I first went to a conference in Brighton in 1978. I couldn’t believe I was rubbing ­shoulders with all these important people and I couldn’t believe that they were taking such a keen interest in me. I would have done anything for them because I was so desperate to make it in politics. “During the years I was attending conferences between 1978 and 1985, I was a full-time political activist. At the same time I was running for office in district and county council elections.”

Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph

Cabinet Minister: Former Education Secretary Keith Joseph

Mr Gilberthorpe claims that at the 1983 Blackpool conference he was asked by Dr Alistair Smith – the Tory Party Chairman in Scotland – to arrange for young rent boys to have sex with two high-profile cabinet ministers, who we are not naming today. Other MPs at that party were said to include Rhodes Boyson and Keith Joseph. In that week he presented the ­then-Prime Minister Mrs Thatcher with a cake to mark her 58th birthday. But he says he also had a more sordid role – using his young looks to find these underage boys for her ministers. At the time, the age of consent made it illegal to have gay sex with anyone under 21-years-old. He said: “Dr Smith, who I looked up to at the time and was the most ­important Tory in Scotland, told me to go and fetch some ‘entertainment’, which was code for young boys and handed me a handful of bank notes. There was about £120.” Mr Gilber-thorpe claims he was not shocked by the request.

He said: “It was a norm and an open secret that these older members of the Tory party, like
Dr Alistair Smith, paid for young men to join them at sex parties. “It was the first time I was asked to fetch them but it was hardly surprising as I was becoming one of their trusted people. There was a well known and used cruising area close to the Imperial Hotel, which was a conference hotel. The hotel was not open to the public. “I was expected to find the youngest and prettiest boys. It was what those men wanted. “In fact it was all they wanted. “So myself and another Tory candidate walked down there and sat on some benches underneath an archway in the Pavilion area of Blackpool and waited.”

Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers

Attorney General: Lord Michael Havers

He said they were approached within minutes by a “guy aged about 20” called James. He went on: “I asked him if he wanted to come back to the hotel and he said ‘yes’. We asked if he had any
mates and he went away and came back with two boys who were aged about 15 and no older. “It was a surreal situation as we were dressed in suits and ties and they were wearing jeans. “We said we would make it worth their while and the older one held out his hand and I passed him the money to share out. I promised him there would be plentiful amounts of free booze.”

Mr Gilberthorpe claims he then asked hotel security to contact a man inside who worked at the Conservative Party Central Office to arrange for the three rent boys to be given security clearance and special badges that would allow them to enter the Imperial. He said: “All MPs, members of the National Executive and chosen delegates were given name badges that allowed you access to the conference hotel. “Some of them had a small Oscar sign in the corner which was a code to allow others to know you were allowed into these secret parties.” He claimed the Hollywood-style Oscar symbol was actually in honour of gay writer and poet Oscar Wilde. Once inside the Imperial, he says the group walked up several flights of stairs to a room where politicians were waiting for them, along with a table of cocaine.

In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987

In attendance: Rhodes Boyson at the Conservative party conference in Blackpool, 1987

He said: “We took them straight upstairs and into a room where Dr Smith and other MPs were waiting for them at the party. They were given drinks and cocaine to snort and then they were all moved into the centre of the room.” Mr Gilberthorpe said he witnessed two senior Tories having sex with the boys. He said: “A couple of other MPs were in the room. I can clearly remember seeing one politician, who is now a serving Tory MP, standing there and watching.” Mr Gilberthorpe also claims that two years earlier in 1981 he saw Sir Michael Havers – then Attorney General – at a swimming pool party at the Tory conference in Blackpool, where underage boys were encouraged to perform sex acts on several politicians, who we are also not naming today. He recalled: “In 1981 I was invited back to the Imperial Hotel by a ­Conservative councillor. “He was a big player in the notorious right-wing group the Monday Club. “We arrived at around midnight and I was led down some stairs to a door where two men were stood as security.

“We were allowed to enter and I was led through a tiled changing room where there were piles of clothes strewn across the floor. We then walked into an area where there was a large pool and lots of men either stood around naked or simply wrapped in towels. “Among the MPs I recognised in there were Keith Joseph and Rhodes Boyson. I saw the Attorney General Michael Havers down there as well. “There were a couple of glass tables set up as a mini bar with bottles of spirits on them and there was cocaine on several tables. I saw several boys who were clearly aged between 15 and 16 down there and I saw that a few were performing sex acts on MPs. “Other young men were acting as waiters walking around with little black bow ties on. I was completely shocked by it because I was still only 20 and I had never seen anything like it.” He added: “I stayed for a couple of hours but was tired because a conference was always a boozy affair where mainly spirits were drunk in large ­quantities from about 5pm onwards.”

Request: Smith ‘asked for young boys’

Request: Smith ‘asked for young boys’

Mr Gilberthorpe, now 52, says he also attended a sex party at the Grand Hotel in Brighton during the Conservatives’ 1984 conference. On the night before the seafront hotel was hit by an IRA bomb attack, he claims he saw senior MPs engaging in sex acts with boys below the age of consent at a “corridor party” held in a row of rooms on the fourth floor. He said: “There were two guys on the door at the end of the corridor and because we were in the group I was allowed to enter. Several doors were left open and others were closed.

“There were several men walking from one room to another and enjoying sex acts with other naked men, including boys who were clearly only about 15 or 16 years old. I saw Keith Joseph there and a politician who is now still a serving MP. “It was held on the night before the bomb went off and afterwards one MP crudely joked that it was a good job it was, or there would have been rent boys falling through the floor.” Mr Gilberthorpe, who decided to finally break his silence because he fears an Establishment cover-up, also claims that in the aftermath of the bombing, in which five people were killed, he was asked to look after two rent boys.

He said: “I rushed over there from my hotel after I heard the blast and saw Keith Joseph stood outside in a blanket.” Yesterday he said: “I was a teenager when I first met these men and they manipulated me and groomed me to do their bidding. “Because they were the most powerful men in the land, I was led to believe it was all OK. In truth they were abusers and once they had tired of me they simply discarded me. It is time this came to light before anyone else is abused. “They didn’t think they were doing anything wrong and it was the norm then. They felt untouchable.”

They are criminals Scotland, do not be fooled!

bsx57zxcqaafkmq

sunday-people-20-04-2014

 

Questions over Better Together’s lies over registration for referendum role – As Sunday’s media attack Westminster

Questions over Better Together's registration for referendum role

Questions over Better Together’s registration for referendum role

I ASK AGAIN. CAN WE TRUST THIS UNION AND WESTMINSTER?

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/11/scotland-we-are-not-voting-for-snp-or-any-politician-we-are-voting-for-freedom-and-to-stop-deaths/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/10/letter-from-a-man-who-lived-through-westminster-lies-on-our-last-attempt-at-independence-and-saw-scotland-die-in-industry/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/09/austerity-nuclear-and-foreigners-of-scotland-why-vote-no-and-risk-being-throw-out-and-making-scotland-poor/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/07/scotland-do-we-want-to-stay-in-a-union-run-by-criminals-peadophiles-and-liars/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/06/huge-english-political-sex-scandal-about-to-come-out/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/07/britain-blindly-violating-disabled-peoples-human-rights/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/13/thatcher-covered-up-conservative-sex-scandal-wow-media-are-going-with-it/

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/13/the-political-establishment-sexual-abuse-case-is-about-to-blow-up-as-i-said/

First this here 

Thatcher covered up Conservative Sex Scandal – WOW MEDIA ARE GOING WITH IT!

https://shaunynews.com/2014/07/13/thatcher-covered-up-conservative-sex-scandal-wow-media-are-going-with-it/

The Mirror Group have gone with this story today! Online NOW

The Mirror Group have gone with this story today! Online NOW

Now this

BETTER Together’s place in the referendum campaign was last night thrown into confusion, after it emerged its official application to take part contained the wrong address.

http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/questions-over-better-togethers-registration-for-referendum-role.24741622

The pro-Union movement gave its Glasgow HQ as its address when it applied in April to become a “permitted participant” in the referendum. However, because it is a limited company, the law says Better Together should have used its registered office address in Edinburgh. Better Together said it had been acting on the Electoral Commission’s advice, and that the watchdog told it to use the Glasgow address because this was its day-to-day campaign base. The Commission initially told the Sunday Herald a wrong address would render an application “invalid”, and prompt a fresh application.

However, when the specifics of Better Together’s case were put to it, the Commission said there was “no problem” with the application after all. If the application was invalid, it would cast doubt on the No campaign’s legitimacy. The Commission admitted it had checked Better Together’s address and found the correct one was in Edinburgh, but rather than asking Better Together to amend it, the Commission had simply recorded the Edinburgh address on its own “internal approval record” and used it as the basis for processing the application.

The Commission last night updated its online register of campaigners to show Better Together’s Edinburgh address, and blamed an “administrative error” for not doing so sooner. Earlier this year, the Commission ruled the CBI’s application to be a campaigner was “void” because it was signed by the wrong person, a breach of the same law which says Better Together should have used its Edinburgh address. Despite the inaccuracy, the Commission insisted Better Together’s application was valid and consistent with its guidance and “the law”. However, the Commission was unable to say if the application complied with the relevant section of the Scottish Independence Referendum Act 2013, which is the critical law involved.

A Yes campaign source said: “This suggests real uncertainty and confusion about the exact status of the No campaign, and whether or not they have adhered to their legal obligations. It does indicate a lack of basic competence, which is embarrassing to say the least and could yet be a factor which influences the result.” There are almost 30 registered campaigners in the referendum, including individuals, unions and political parties, as well as Better Together and Yes Scotland. Under electoral law, companies “must” declare their full company name, their office registered with Companies House, and their company number when applying to be a permitted participant. Better Together, whose full legal name is Better Together 2012 Limited, should therefore have used its registered office address. Since its creation in June 2012, this has been 133 Fountainbridge, Edinburgh, the same office as its lawyers, Tods Murray LLP. Instead, it used 5 Blythswood Square, Glasgow.

After the Sunday Herald discovered the error, it asked the Commission in general terms about the consequences of an inaccurate address on a form to be a referendum permitted participant. In a statement on Thursday, the Commission said: “If an organisation or individual provided inaccurate information on their form and notified the Electoral Commission of that, their application would be invalid and we would work with them to make sure they supply an application with the correct information.” However, when we raised Better Together’s address on Friday, the Commission said: “It doesn’t impact on Better Together’s registration at all and there was no problem with the information they provided us.”

In statement yesterday, the Commission said: “The approval of an application by Better Together to register as a permitted participant was consistent with our guidance and the law. Their registration … is valid. “Following Better Together’s application … we verified their details, including checking their details on Companies House. This is a straightforward and standard practice that we carry out with all applications. It would not have required any correspondence with Better Together. Better Together’s address with Companies House was in Edinburgh. “This address should have been recorded on our list of permitted participants rather than the Glasgow address. This was an administrative error on our part and has been amended accordingly on our website.” A Better Together spokesman said: “We followed the guidance and advice given to us by the Electoral Commission. They have made clear to us that there was an administrative error on their part and has been rectified.”